danh2010 wrote:
OK, so thery both log the same thing then. Perfect. Thanks!
sweet - I did not know that 5.2 moved away from requiring a database for events logging - syslog strikes me as a MUCH better alternative ....
danh2010 wrote:
OK, so thery both log the same thing then. Perfect. Thanks!
sweet - I did not know that 5.2 moved away from requiring a database for events logging - syslog strikes me as a MUCH better alternative ....