Quantcast
Channel: VMware Communities: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 206069

Re: New !! Open unofficial storage performance thread

$
0
0

Hey guys, I know this thread isn't the most active place on the internets but I'm hoping maybe a storage networking guru can help me out. I'm troubleshooting poor performance on our iSCSI SAN and seeing some interesting IOmeter results:


Array: FreeNAS 27 SATA disk array 2x 1Gb links

Access Specification NameIOpsMBpsLatency(ms)
Max Throughput-100%Read3563.99111.3716.80
RealLife-60%Rand-65%Read984.897.6960.35
Max Throughput-50%Read5800.14181.2510.11
Random-8k-70%Read1692.6713.2235.09

 

Now, looking past these fairly mediocre results - one thing that's come up consistently is that the 100% random 8K 70% Read tests is consistently faster than the RealLife test, sometimes up to 2x as "fast" and considerably less latency (although both are bad, I know). In my mind I'm thinking that the 100% randomness should result in slower performance... I'm wondering if this is a symptom of some sort of misconfig on our networking gear. I've isolated it to our iSCSI "core", which is a stack of four PowerConnect 8024s. If i isolated this array to a single switch in the stack and run the tests directly from my laptop these are the results (I think I'm hitting some bottlenecks related to the laptop NIC):

 

Access Specification NameIOpsMBpsLatency(ms)
Max Throughput-100%Read1798.6156.2125.48
RealLife-60%Rand-65%Read5447.4642.566.20
Max Throughput-50%Read1757.2554.9121.81
Random-8k-70%Read5245.1240.986.10

 

Anyway, I've reviewed the 8024s config and they're to Dell's recommended best practices (jumbos, flow control, unicast storm control disabled). Nothing looks obviously wrong in the stack, CPU/mem utilization is fine, no stackport errors, etc etc.

 

Someone want to throw an idea my way? I'm out of ideas. Thanks!


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 206069

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>